![]() ![]() I run over 90 connected devices/servers/VMs/web apps and wireless devices connect via UBNT AP AC Pro. I benefit from the full 1Gbps internet connection. It's running as a VM with limited resources and is definitely NOT a network bottleneck. So the question is, what would I do in your place? Well, I was in your place and I selected XG. Sophos XG on the other hand limits the hardware you can assign to the device under its Home license to 6GB RAM and 4 CPU Cores. UTM 9 is limited to 50 IPs with its free Home license and had no limitations on what hardware it is run on (if you have 64GB RAM you want to throw at it, go for it - but it won't benefit you though). This is also where the Sophos XG distinguishes itself from UTM 9. You'll notice that once you start turning on those features like IPS, performance takes a serious hit. Have a look here at the performance specs for the SG210. I could never achieve the same when running UTM 9.not even close. The VM is assigned 6GB RAM and 2 vCPU and doesn't break a sweat with my 1Gbps internet connection. I have Sophos XG running as a VM on a Dell R230, E3-1240v5 CPU. If you plan on running application control, IPS, AV.etc, you will want to look at XG instead of UTM 9. Obviously, I would like the UTM to not limit the bandwidth if possible. It is leaps and bounds more efficient than UTM 9 and if you're thinking of running it in a VM, you'll really notice the difference. Is there any reason why you're going with the Sophos UTM instead of Sophos XG? I've used both for a few years and I prefer the XG over UTM 9. In my situation, would the 10 user license cover my needs or is “user” in Sophos terms more analogous to “device”? What advice does the community have for this setup? Should I really be looking at the Sophos XG platform? Are there other options I should consider?įinally, it looks like the Sophos VMs are licensed by user. This has some appeal as I could then add an Active Directory domain controller to this server for better redundancy. Alternatively, it looks like I could get a very reasonably spec’d HP DL120 and run ESXi on it with a UTM 9 VM for less than $500 in hardware cost. I could get the Sophos SG 135 and it should meet most of my needs easily, with the 210 being an option if the community believes the 135 would be underpowered. In addition to the UTM protection, I would also like to run an incoming proxy server (this does not have to be full-speed), replacing a Windows VM.įor the UTM hardware, it looks like I have a couple of options. ![]() ![]() The new UTM will replace a Ubiquity EdgeRouter. ![]() I do have an ESXi server that runs a series of VMs providing various services most of which funnel through a single proxy server, which is exposed to the Internet, but only accepting SSL connections. Most devices (about 70) are hardwired through Cisco SG300 switches with the wireless devices connected through Ubiquity AP-AC Pro access points. I have a symmetrical 1 Gbps internet connection for two regular household users and a variety of temporary guests. I am looking to add a UTM to my home network and would like to solicit some advice / feedback on the hardware After a lot of research and working with the online demos, I have decided on using the Sophos platform (UTM 9).Ī bit about my network. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |